moonfemale3

Texas Asbestos Lawsuit History Asbestos lawsuits have led to the bankruptcies of a number of companies. An experienced mesothelioma lawyer can help you obtain compensation. Doctors and health experts long warned about the dangers of asbestos exposure. Industry leaders have minimized the risks. In time, more and more people fell ill with asbestos-related ailments. Upland asbestos attorneys took off in the 1970s, shortly after scientific studies began to link asbestos to serious illnesses such as mesothelioma or asbestosis. Because asbestos-related diseases don't typically manifest until years after exposure, thousands of lawsuits were filed. These lawsuits were filed in Texas due to its favorable laws. Johns Manville was the leading producer in the 1940s and 1950s of asbestos-related products. This case had a major impact on asbestos litigation. In the 1980s, it was revealed that Lewis Brown, the CEO of the company, put profits above the health and safety of his employees. In his deposition testimony, Brown admitted that he was heavily dependent on Dr. Russell Budd, the chief medical advisor to his company. Budd was a doctor who was known for his callous disregard for employees' health was a well-known persona. The evidence showed that Johns Manville knew about the asbestos hazards but did nothing to protect its employees. The court declared that the company was responsible for any damages that occur if employees later develop mesothelioma, or other asbestos-related diseases. The court also ruled that the company was responsible for damages to the families of employees who passed away. Following the decision in Borel, many asbestos victims and their families sought compensation from the companies who used the material. Unfortunately, the majority of these claims were rejected for a variety of reasons. A few cases were allowed to proceed, and the courts drew up a set of guidelines that guide the handling of asbestos-related lawsuits. In the 1990s, asbestos defendants were still seeking legal rulings to reduce their liability. For example they wanted to argue that the asbestos materials were not part of their product and thus could not be held responsible for injuries sustained by people who worked with asbestos. The claims were rejected and the U.S. Supreme Court rejected the “asbestos products” defense. Today, mesothelioma victims' right to pursue compensation from accountable parties in a case is protected under federal and state law. However insurance companies continue combat these claims tooth and nail.